Array
(
    [id] => 188
    [date] => 2018-11-19
    [doi] => 
    [title] => Wsparcie społeczne a stres w pracy kierowniczej
    [title_en] => SOCIAL SUPPORT AND STRESS IN MANAGERIAL WORK
    [authors] => Roman Cieślak
    [abstract] => 

The purpose of the study was to verify the House's model (1981). This model deals with a moderating role of social support in the relation between stress and well-being. Two additional elements were considered in the model: multidimensionality of the construct of social support and individual variable – hardiness. The sample comprised 228 men, lower and middle level managers. The results show that the model is a good way for futureresearch. Social support indexes can be significant sources of variation of role stress (hypothesis 1), and well-being (hypothesis 2). Social support indexes can also buffer deleterious effects of stress on well-being (hypothesis 3). However, we still do not know why a given index of social support moderates the relation between stress and well-being. It seems that some individual variables play an important role determining an individual need for a given type of social support. More unambiguous results deal with hardiness. It appears that this variable acts through the same mechanism as social support it: determines the level of stress, the level of well-being and the buffer effects of stress on well-being.

[abstract_en] => [keywords] => stress, social support, managerial work [keywords_en] => [file_path] => /files/articles/1998-4-wsparcie-spoeczne-a-stres-w-pracy-kierowniczej.pdf [okladka] => psychologia_pracy_i_organizacji.jpg [rocznik] => Rocznik: 1998 Tom: 4 Numer: 1 [strony] => 29-46 )
wsparcie-spoeczne-a-stres-w-pracy-kierowniczej

Wsparcie społeczne a stres w pracy kierowniczej

okladka
SOCIAL SUPPORT AND STRESS IN MANAGERIAL WORK

Roman Cieślak

DOI:

Rocznik: 1998 Tom: 4 Numer: 1
Strony: 29-46

The purpose of the study was to verify the House's model (1981). This model deals with a moderating role of social support in the relation between stress and well-being. Two additional elements were considered in the model: multidimensionality of the construct of social support and individual variable – hardiness. The sample comprised 228 men, lower and middle level managers. The results show that the model is a good way for futureresearch. Social support indexes can be significant sources of variation of role stress (hypothesis 1), and well-being (hypothesis 2). Social support indexes can also buffer deleterious effects of stress on well-being (hypothesis 3). However, we still do not know why a given index of social support moderates the relation between stress and well-being. It seems that some individual variables play an important role determining an individual need for a given type of social support. More unambiguous results deal with hardiness. It appears that this variable acts through the same mechanism as social support it: determines the level of stress, the level of well-being and the buffer effects of stress on well-being.

stress, social support, managerial work